Sample only. The offer, seller and documents below are fictional.

CommodityScreen

Report CS-SAMPLE-0001

Offer due-diligence report

Completed 12 Oct 2026

Score (0–100, higher is safer)

18 / 100

Hard-stop cap applied: score capped at 40

75–100 Proceed · 45–74 Caution · 0–44 Stop. A hard-stop indicator always means Stop.

Recommendation

Stop

Based on the documents and information received, not on a judgement of any person or company.

Summary

The offer shows several strong risk indicators commonly seen in non-performing fuel offers: a discount far below the Platts benchmark, a fixed gross/net commission split, a dip-test/TTV procedure that asks for buyer funds before title documents, and a seller identity that could not be independently confirmed. We could not verify the tank receipt or the claimed refinery allocation. This is not a finding that the seller acts in bad faith; it means the documents received do not yet support the offer.

Offer as received

Offer type
Diesel EN590
Product
EN590 10 ppm ULSD
Quantity
500,000 MT x 12 months
Delivery terms
CIF Rotterdam
Price basis
Platts NWE minus USD 38/MT gross / minus USD 20/MT net
Counterparty (as stated)
Example Petroleum Trading FZE (fictional)
Counterparty country
United Arab Emirates

Offer terms and pricing

  • Risk indicator

    Price of Platts NWE minus USD 38/MT is well beyond the typical small discount (more than USD 15/MT under benchmark).

  • Caution

    Fixed 'gross/net' discount structure indicates commissions for several intermediaries built into the price.

  • Risk indicator

    Monthly volume of 500,000 MT is very large for a trading company with no published track record.

  • Verified

    Website domain registration confirmed via RDAP.

    Source: RDAP · 11 Oct 2026

  • Observation

    The seller's stated address is a serviced office commonly used by trading intermediaries.

Seller identity and contact

  • Caution

    Offer arrived by WhatsApp through a broker; the titleholder is not named in the SCO.

  • Risk indicator

    Sender uses a free webmail address that does not match the company website domain.

  • Caution

    A company with a similar name appears in a free-zone public register; the registration number on the SCO could not be matched.

Documents and procedure

  • Risk indicator

    Procedure requires the buyer to issue an SBLC before a contract is signed and before title documents are exchanged bank to bank.

  • Caution

    Seller asked for the buyer's CIS, passport copy and BCL before providing any verifiable documents of its own.

  • Caution

    Tank receipt names a terminal but gives no tank number that the terminal could confirm.

Verification table

  • Company registration

    Could not verify

    Name similar, registration number does not match SCO.

    Source: Free-zone public register · 11 Oct 2026

  • Website domain age

    Verified

    Domain registered 4 months before the offer date.

    Source: RDAP · 11 Oct 2026

  • Legal Entity Identifier (LEI)

    Could not verify

    No LEI record found for the stated name.

    Source: GLEIF · 11 Oct 2026

  • Tank receipt

    Could not verify

    Terminal did not confirm the tank or the storage contract.

    Source: Terminal operator (email enquiry) · 12 Oct 2026

  • Refinery allocation letter

    Does not match

    Letterhead and signatory differ from refinery's published details.

    Source: Refinery public contact · 12 Oct 2026

  • Inspection report (SGS)

    Not checked

    No report number provided.

    Source: SGS certificate verification · 12 Oct 2026

  • Sanctions screening

    Not checked

    Not part of this sample report.

    Source: Public sanctions lists · 12 Oct 2026

Suggested next steps

  1. Do not pay for dip tests, injections or any instrument before title documents are exchanged bank to bank.
  2. Ask the seller to name the titleholder and provide a tank number the terminal can confirm directly.
  3. Request a redacted past bill of lading and an inspection report number you can check with the inspector.
  4. Order a human review if you want us to contact the terminal and refinery on your behalf.

Disclaimer

This report lists risk indicators and verification status based on the information and documents supplied and on public sources on the dates shown. It is not legal, financial or investment advice, and it does not state or imply that any named person or company is acting fraudulently or in bad faith. No guarantee is given that a transaction will or will not perform. You remain responsible for your own decisions.

Confidential — prepared exclusively for the ordering client. Submitted offers, documents and counterparty details are not shared with other users or used to trade, broker or approach named counterparties.

Report CS-SAMPLE-0001 · prepared by CommodityScreen · 12 Oct 2026

© 2026 CommodityScreen™. All rights reserved.